That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me why xalan is not in the name ;))
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > mvn install outputs this: > > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException: > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74) > Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701) > at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048) > at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018) > at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93) > ... 9 more > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xpath.VariableStack > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335) > at java.lang > > > On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> >> Hi Romain, >> >> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in >> - compat >> - impl >> - jstlel >> - standard-test >> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test. >> >> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check the >> output? >> >> Matthew >> >> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matthew, >>> >>> if you checkout >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and >>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to >>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath >>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the >>> way to go I think. >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn >>> >>> >>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead >>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: >>>> >>>> hi rmannibucau, >>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after >>>> a >>>> busy period. >>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC >>>>> >>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> >>>>> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be >>>>>> ignored? >>>>>> >>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan' >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45: >>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52: >>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib >>>>>> xmlns:xalan=" >>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 >>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; >>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee >>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; >>>>>> version="2.0"> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: >>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache >>>>>> .org/xslt" >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan >>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib >>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; >>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 >>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; >>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee >>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; >>>>>> version="2.0"> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: >>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - >>>>>> xalan >>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: >>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> Binary file >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz >>>>>> matches >>>>>> Binary file >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip >>>>>> matches >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - >>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- >>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan >>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> Binary file >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- >>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches >>>>>> Binary file >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war >>>>>> matches >>>>>> >>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462 >>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93: >>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94: >>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95: >>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96: >>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21: >>>>>> * [lifted from xalan] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99: >>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100: >>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36: >>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47: >>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100: >>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101: >>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in >>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin >>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21: >>>>>> * [lifted from xalan] >>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>> k> >>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all >>>>>>> xalan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> refs? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other >>>>>>>>>>> versions >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yep >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib >>>>>>>>>>>> folder >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fop >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain >>>>>>>>>>>>>> said >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy...@gmx.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjae...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
