There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit :
> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored? > > Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan' > ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45: > xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; > ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52: > xalan:indent-amount="2"/> > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib xmlns:xalan=" > http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 > 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; > xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; version="2.0"> > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache > .org/xslt" > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/> > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan > xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib > xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 > 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; > xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; version="2.0"> > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: > - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan > xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: > - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > Binary file > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz > matches > Binary file > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip > matches > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - > xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: > - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- > SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan > xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- > SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches > Binary file > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war > matches > ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: > - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 > ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462 > xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin > ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93: > <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94: > <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95: > <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96: > <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21: > * [lifted from xalan] > ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99: > <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100: > <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36: > - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47: > - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100: > <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101: > <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in > maven-bundle-plugin > ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21: > * [lifted from xalan] > ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId> > ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> > > On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Yes >> >> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >> k> >> a écrit : >> >> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan >>> refs? >>> >>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> >>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date >>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>> >>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead < >>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk >>>> >>>> : >>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;) >>>>> >>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>> k> >>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other >>>>>> versions >>>>>> >>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder - >>>>>>>> fop >>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> gerDefault >>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager >>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager. >>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13 >>>>>>>>> 7) >>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102) >>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349) >>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337) >>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T >>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor >>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397) >>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty >>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty >>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain >>>>>>>>> said >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE >>>>>>>>> stack >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development >>>>>>>>>> setup. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep >>>>>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Matthew >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its >>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't >>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I >>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I >>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so >>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>> you're >>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one >>>>>>>>>>>> manually. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy...@gmx.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjae...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
