Hello, I will be able to use (and thus, to make feedbacks) on a TomEE+ 8 binary preview release if it includes JAX RS 2.1 : I have some fun stuff to do with SSE for feeding some reactive uis :)
Best regards, Alex 2018-02-01 16:39 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > a lot of libs should be updated before the release I think, like johnzon > which is ready (literally like 2 poms to update). but yes we can do a > release anytime technically. In terms of first > bundle we can at least desire to have CDI 2 webprofile support, probably > json-p/json-b and maybe jax-rs upgrade (which should be trivial as well). > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > > 2018-02-01 16:10 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: > >> These are CDI TCK only. Java EE 8 TCK aren't available openly (Open >> sourced) so we can't certify the Apache version of TomEE >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > exciting. when it passes all the tests will there be a beta release ? >> > >> > >> > On 01/02/2018 14:37, Mark Struberg wrote: >> > >> >> With a bit help from Romains we are now down to 10 failing tests: >> >> >> >> >> >> ERROR] Failures: >> >> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Deployment >> >> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 >> >> » EJB >> >> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquillian.ru >> >> n:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquill >> >> ian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >> [ERROR] ContainerLifeCycleEventRuntimeInvocationTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Deployment >> >> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164->interceptedBea >> >> nForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 expected [true] but found [false] >> >> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testDecoratorMetadata:91 >> >> » EJB >> >> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testInterceptorMetadata:78 >> >> » EJB >> >> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessDisposalMethodTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Runtime >> >> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessProducerMethodTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Runtime >> >> [INFO] >> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 1577, Failures: 10, Errors: 0, Skipped: 26 >> >> >> >> LieGrue,strub >> >> >> >> On Thursday, 1 February 2018, 00:21:58 CET, Mark Struberg >> >> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: >> >> Fixed the new CDI-2.0 <trim/> feature. >> >> >> >> Now down to 16 ^^ >> >> >> >> [ERROR] Failures: >> >> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Deployment >> >> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testInjection:79 >> >> expected object to not be null >> >> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest>Arquillian.run:164->testResolutio >> >> n:86->AbstractTest.getUniqueBean:133->AbstractTest. >> resolveUniqueBean:169 >> >> » UnsatisfiedResolution >> >> [ERROR] EJBAsyncObserverMethodRemoteBusinessMethodTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Runtime >> >> [ERROR] EJBObserverMethodRemoteBusinessMethodTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Runtime >> >> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 >> >> » EJB >> >> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropagationInAsyncObserverTest>Arqu >> >> illian.run:164->testSecurityContextNotPropagated:68 expected [true] but >> >> found [false] >> >> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropagationInAsyncObserverTest>Arqu >> >> illian.run:164->testSecurityContextPropagation:59 NullPointer >> >> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquillian.ru >> >> n:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquill >> >> ian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >> [ERROR] ContainerLifeCycleEventRuntimeInvocationTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Deployment >> >> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164->interceptedBea >> >> nForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 expected [true] but found [false] >> >> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testDecoratorMetadata:91 >> >> » EJB >> >> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> testInterceptorMetadata:78 >> >> » EJB >> >> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessDisposalMethodTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Runtime >> >> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessProducerMethodTest>Arquillian. >> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> >> » Runtime >> >> [INFO] >> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 1585, Failures: 16, Errors: 0, Skipped: 30 >> >> >> >> >> >> LieGrue, >> >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 31.01.2018 um 11:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com >> >>> >: >> >>> >> >>> From memory, until you need jsf or advanced web stuff all should run >> in >> >>> embedded mode. That said we can need to tune jaas to match the >> >>> expectations >> >>> of the tcks. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >> >>> >> >>> 2018-01-31 11:00 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: >> >>> >> >>> Txs JL! >> >>>> >> >>>> Btw, this is the current status: >> >>>> >> >>>> [ERROR] Failures: >> >>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest>Arquillian.arquillian >> >>>> BeforeClass:109 >> >>>> » Deployment >> >>>> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest>Arquillian.run:164->testInjection >> >>>> :79 >> >>>> expected object to not be null >> >>>> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> >>>> testResolution:86->AbstractTest.getUniqueBean:133-> >> >>>> AbstractTest.resolveUniqueBean:169 >> >>>> » UnsatisfiedResolution >> >>>> [ERROR] TrimmedBeanArchiveTest>Arquillian.arquillianBeforeClass:109 >> » >> >>>> Deployment can't... >> >>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseTrimmedBeanArchiveTest>Arquillian.arquillianBefore >> >>>> Class:109 >> >>>> » Deployment >> >>>> [ERROR] EJBAsyncObserverMethodRemoteBusinessMethodTest>Arquillian.ar >> >>>> quillianBeforeClass:109 >> >>>> » Runtime >> >>>> [ERROR] EJBObserverMethodRemoteBusinessMethodTest>Arquillian.arquill >> >>>> ianBeforeClass:109 >> >>>> » Runtime >> >>>> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> >>>> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropagationInAsyncObserverTest> >> >>>> Arquillian.run:164->testSecurityContextNotPropagated:68 expected >> [true] >> >>>> but found [false] >> >>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropagationInAsyncObserverTest> >> >>>> Arquillian.run:164->testSecurityContextPropagation:59 NullPointer >> >>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvocationContextTest>Arquillian. >> >>>> run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMethodInvocationContextTest> >> >>>> Arquillian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >> >>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >> >>>> interceptedBeanForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 expected [true] >> but >> >>>> found [false] >> >>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164->testDecor >> >>>> atorMetadata:91 >> >>>> » EJB >> >>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest>Arquillian.run:164->testInter >> >>>> ceptorMetadata:78 >> >>>> » EJB >> >>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessDisposalMethodTest>Arquillian.arquillianBefore >> >>>> Class:109 >> >>>> » Runtime >> >>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessProducerMethodTest>Arquillian.arquillianBefore >> >>>> Class:109 >> >>>> » Runtime >> >>>> [INFO] >> >>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1587, Failures: 17, Errors: 0, Skipped: 19 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I'll fix the trim test next. >> >>>> But I need a bit help with the others as I'm not quite sure whether >> >>>> those >> >>>> tests are supposed to work in cdi-embedded or only in the >> full-profile. >> >>>> >> >>>> We have some failures like: >> >>>> >> >>>> Caused by: javax.ejb.EJBAccessException: Unauthorized Access by >> >>>> Principal >> >>>> Denied >> >>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.stateless.StatelessContainer. >> >>>> invoke(StatelessContainer.java:189) >> >>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbObjectProxyHandler. >> >>>> synchronizedBusinessMethod(EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:265) >> >>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbObjectProxyHandler. >> >>>> businessMethod(EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:260) >> >>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm. >> EjbObjectProxyHandler._invoke( >> >>>> EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:89) >> >>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.BaseEjbProxyHandler.invoke( >> >>>> BaseEjbProxyHandler.java:347) >> >>>> at org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.event. >> observer.context.enterprise. >> >>>> staticMethod.Printer$$LocalBeanProxy.printSuccess( >> >>>> org/jboss/cdi/tck/tests/event/observer/context/enterprise/ >> >>>> staticMethod/Printer.java) >> >>>> at org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.event. >> observer.context.enterprise. >> >>>> staticMethod.Student.printSuccess(Student.java:33) >> >>>> >> >>>> Who might be able to help a bit? >> >>>> We could also do a hangout session to hang over the code together. >> >>>> Done this yesterday with Reinhard Sandtner to fix a few Extension >> bugs. >> >>>> >> >>>> LieGrue, >> >>>> strub >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 10:38 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> >>>>> >> >>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: >> >>>> >> >>>>> yes yank the profile if not usable and if no one should use it to >> avoid >> >>>>> mistakes >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> >>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg >> >>>>> >> >>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >> >>>> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Then we should at least add a README? >> >>>>>> Or at least document that profile in the pom. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue, >> >>>>>> strub >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >> >>>> >> >>>>> : >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> 2018-01-31 9:34 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >> >: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Yes I thought something similar when trashing 2 hours to try to get >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> the >> >>>> >> >>>>> JAXB generator running. >> >>>>>>>> Just to figure it might be broken beyond repair... >> >>>>>>>> Thanks that you at least confirm this view and spare me further >> >>>>>>>> investigation. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> There are 2 options on the table >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 1.) Do a quick hack and add the <trim/> support directly in the >> code >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> 2.) Invest more time and fix the JAXB source generator setup >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> No point today to do it. Can be worse keeping it as a comment >> >>>>>>> somewhere >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> for >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> future specs if needed but not for existing one IMHO. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I'm tempted to go 1. >> >>>>>>>> But of course I'm happy if someone finds a bit time to fix the >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> generator >> >>>> >> >>>>> setup. >> >>>>>>>> David, you did this initially. Is it worth it and can you free up >> >>>>>>>> some >> >>>>>>>> time for it? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> LieGrue, >> >>>>>>>> strub >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> : >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Mark, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> For simple updates like that I tend to update the sax parser >> >>>>>>>>> manually >> >>>>>>>>> (that's what we did for JSF since most of the model is not >> handled >> >>>>>>>>> by >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> tomee >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> anyway). >> >>>>>>>>> For CDI we are supposed to still use JAXB (since there can be a >> lot >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>> >> >>>>> beans.xml): >> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/ >> >>>>>>>> ReadDescriptors.java#L681 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> >>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> 2018-01-31 8:17 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg >> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >> >>>>>>>>> >: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi folks! >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I've come down to just 18 failing tests in tck/cdi-embedded. >> >>>>>>>>>> Most of them are EE related (missing privileges exceptions etc) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> There is one left with the CDI integration: <trim/> support. >> >>>>>>>>>> This needs a change in the beans.xml schema. >> >>>>>>>>>> I've added the changes and moved to container/openejb-jee/src/ >> >>>>>>>>>> main/resources/META-INF/schema/beans_2_0.xsd >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> But now I totally fail to generate the JAXB sources. >> >>>>>>>>>> I've found the maven profile to start the generator, but it >> simply >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> fails >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> with an Exception. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Anyone able to help out? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> The work is done in fb_tomee8 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Btw, I also tried the attached patch to move to valid urls at >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> least... >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >> >>>>>>>>>> strub >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> > >> > >>
