I think it is a very important spec, also for non-microprofile implementations as it can enhance the interoperability of all servers.
I'm also very interested in the implementation (and want to help a bit with it also :) ) regards Rudy On 2 February 2018 at 11:23, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > To clarify this even further: > The Geronimo Server is now officially dead. > But the Geronimo project is not. It alredy contains quite a few modular > parts which are reused in many ASF projects and also outside. > Examples is the geronimo-transaction-manager, geronimo-javamail, > geronimo-config, xbean-finder, etc > > Of course it would probably make sense to fold those 2 projects together, > as already discussed in the past. > I'm still all open to it, but I have an important criterium to fulfil: > If we move those portable parts to TomEE, then this would mean that TomEE > would become an 'Umbrella project'. > And further that we would need a new name for those portable parts. > They would effectively be mainatained by the TomEE community (which has a > big overlap with Geronimo anyway) but those parts must clearly be > recognized separately from TomEE. > > Otherwise people will assume that those parts only work within TomEE - > where in reality they would even work on WildFly or Liberty, etc. or even a > naked Tomcat. > Got me? > > We might e.g. brand them as 'TomEE Geronimo Spare Parts Department' :) > > LieGrue, > strub > > PS: I'd also love to keep the org.apache.geronimo package name to ease > backward compatibility. > > > > Am 02.02.2018 um 11:08 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > 2018-02-02 11:05 GMT+01:00 Otávio Gonçalves de Santana < > > osant...@tomitribe.com>: > > > >> Guys, I have a question: > >> > >> Why not a project to each implementation? > >> > > > > this is the case but geronimo is used as an umbrella project. > > > > > >> This way I can use just a specific if I want also. > >> > > > > exactly the goal and user usage AFAIK ;) > > > > long story short: we learnt from the past errors and since always the > same > > people work on these projects it is better to not split it accross N > > communities since > > it leads to a lot of efforts for these people. Having a single umbrella > > project with N subprojects reduces the administrative work etc and > enhance > > the projects productivity. > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi JL, > >>> > >>> Microprofile apache effort is hosted in geronimo and John already spoke > >>> about it I think. Would probably saner to keep it all at the same place > >> for > >>> the foundation. > >>> > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > >>> rmannibucau> | > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > >>> ee-8-high-performance> > >>> > >>> 2018-02-02 9:39 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com > >>> : > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I was wondering if we could have the Microprofile JWT implemented in > >>> TomEE. > >>>> What do you think? > >>>> > >>>> I was reading the spec and I'd like to contribute that in. > >>>> > >>>> Jean-Louis > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
