Oops my bad: please read in my previous mail that I just opened JOHNZON-160:
 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-160?jql=text%20~%20%22MapperException%22

Thanks,
Alexandre

2018-03-04 15:08 GMT+01:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
> Hello Romain & Mark,
>
> Yes I already filled a generic JIRA JOHNZON-149 a while ago for asking
> Johnzon upgrade to 1.1.x in TomEE 7.0.5.
>
> And I just filled JOHNZON-105 with a more specific JSON-B/Mapper issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JOHNZON/issues/JOHNZON-105?filter=allopenissues
>
> It would be great to have a fix for it in upcoming TomEE 7.0.5, along
> with latest security updates on embedded components (Tomcat, etc..)
>
> I will provide feedbacks with our large & complex web apps as soon as
> there's something testable as a snapshot (or I can built stuff with
> Maven, but i'll need by steps to make sure I'm pointing to appropriate
> repos/versions/tags)
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
>
> 2018-03-04 14:46 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>> @Mark: it is tracked on johnzon (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/JOHNZON-149).
>> There was the proposal I did months ago to just use jsonp/b 1.1/1.0 in
>> tomee 7 (doesnt prevent anything from tomee perspective if we drop java 7
>> compat). If not desired we should redo 1.x from master pby to avoid an half
>> merged branch.
>>
>> Le 4 mars 2018 12:40, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Alex!
>>>
>>> johnzon-1.0.x is targetting JSON-P_1.0 (EE7) and johnzon-1.0.0 is indeed
>>> the last version we shipped so far.
>>>
>>> johnzon-1.1.x is targetting JSON-P_1.1 and JSON-B_1.0.
>>> Those are all EE8 specs and thus this is also the version used in TomEE8.
>>>
>>> If you have some urgent need/request for a fix in Johnzon-1.0.x (EE7) then
>>> please identify the tickets you suggest to have fixed and report them on
>>> the d...@johnzon.apache.org list.
>>> What could work is if you go through either the tickets resolved in
>>> various johnzon-1.1.x versions, or scan the git log for fixes you want to
>>> have backported.
>>> We will then discuss it over there, create tickets and then merge back the
>>> stuff.
>>> The Johnzon team is surely happy about every helping hand!
>>>
>>> Btw, that's really the same for almost all the parts of TomEE.
>>> 85% of the tickets and improvements are really happening at all the other
>>> projects: johnzon, bval, OpenWebBeans, OpenJPA, MyFaces, Tomcat, Geronimo,
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> Of course it's a good idea to keep the TomEE project in the loop from a
>>> high-level perspective. For example to summarise the tickets which will get
>>> resolved.
>>> But the actual work + the release etc will happen on the Johnzon, OWB, etc
>>> lists.
>>>
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Am 03.03.2018 um 23:32 schrieb Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > +1 for a TomEE+ 7.0.5 asap, I volonteer to test it against our large web
>>> apps!
>>> > By the way, TomEE+ 7.0.4 had a super old version of Johnzon (1.0.0 if
>>> > I remember well), could 7.0.5 embedded a decently more recent Johnzon
>>> > version to fix the tons of issues we had to hack around with Johnzon
>>> > 1.0.0 ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Alex
>>> >
>>> > 2018-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>>> >> hi folks!
>>> >>
>>> >> We discussed this quite some times and we got good feedback so far. So
>>> it's finally time to make this reality.
>>> >>
>>> >> Over the weekend I'd like to switch TomEE to master and create a
>>> maintenance branch for Tomee7.
>>> >>
>>> >> After that I'd love to roll a first TomEE8 version in say one month
>>> from now.
>>> >>
>>> >> Any objection?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> LieGrue,
>>> >> strub
>>> >>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to