Yes, if we want to release now we'd need to roll that change back.

Jon

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, 17:55 Romain Manni-Bucau, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Le 29 mars 2018 18:23, "Jonathan Gallimore" <[email protected]>
> a écrit :
>
> We did talk about doing a TomEE 7 release. I'm willing to be release
> manager. I have 2 questions:
>
> * Does the TomEE 7 / master branch have the fix you want already, or is
> there work to do there?
>
> * I did upgrade xbean to a version that handles java 9 and 10, and I also
> pushed updates to OWB and OpenJPA for the same. Do we want to wait for
> releases of those, or do we want to release right away?
>
>
> Guess we want to have a single xbean version so either wait or rollback
> pby.
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed that in latest TomEE 7.0.5 SNAPSHOT we will have Johnzon 1.0.0.
> > Is there any chance to see Romain's proposal to ise jsonp/b 1.1/1.0 in
> > tomee 7 come out anytime soon?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-04 14:46 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> > > @Mark: it is tracked on johnzon (
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/JOHNZON-149
> > ).
> > > There was the proposal I did months ago to just use jsonp/b 1.1/1.0 in
> > > tomee 7 (doesnt prevent anything from tomee perspective if we drop java
> 7
> > > compat). If not desired we should redo 1.x from master pby to avoid an
> > half
> > > merged branch.
> > >
> > > Le 4 mars 2018 12:40, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > >> Hi Alex!
> > >>
> > >> johnzon-1.0.x is targetting JSON-P_1.0 (EE7) and johnzon-1.0.0 is
> indeed
> > >> the last version we shipped so far.
> > >>
> > >> johnzon-1.1.x is targetting JSON-P_1.1 and JSON-B_1.0.
> > >> Those are all EE8 specs and thus this is also the version used in
> > TomEE8.
> > >>
> > >> If you have some urgent need/request for a fix in Johnzon-1.0.x (EE7)
> > then
> > >> please identify the tickets you suggest to have fixed and report them
> on
> > >> the [email protected] list.
> > >> What could work is if you go through either the tickets resolved in
> > >> various johnzon-1.1.x versions, or scan the git log for fixes you want
> > to
> > >> have backported.
> > >> We will then discuss it over there, create tickets and then merge back
> > the
> > >> stuff.
> > >> The Johnzon team is surely happy about every helping hand!
> > >>
> > >> Btw, that's really the same for almost all the parts of TomEE.
> > >> 85% of the tickets and improvements are really happening at all the
> > other
> > >> projects: johnzon, bval, OpenWebBeans, OpenJPA, MyFaces, Tomcat,
> > Geronimo,
> > >> etc.
> > >>
> > >> Of course it's a good idea to keep the TomEE project in the loop from
> a
> > >> high-level perspective. For example to summarise the tickets which
> will
> > get
> > >> resolved.
> > >> But the actual work + the release etc will happen on the Johnzon, OWB,
> > etc
> > >> lists.
> > >>
> > >> txs and LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > Am 03.03.2018 um 23:32 schrieb Alex The Rocker <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> >
> > >> > +1 for a TomEE+ 7.0.5 asap, I volonteer to test it against our large
> > web
> > >> apps!
> > >> > By the way, TomEE+ 7.0.4 had a super old version of Johnzon (1.0.0
> if
> > >> > I remember well), could 7.0.5 embedded a decently more recent
> Johnzon
> > >> > version to fix the tons of issues we had to hack around with Johnzon
> > >> > 1.0.0 ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Alex
> > >> >
> > >> > 2018-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]
> >:
> > >> >> hi folks!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> We discussed this quite some times and we got good feedback so far.
> > So
> > >> it's finally time to make this reality.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Over the weekend I'd like to switch TomEE to master and create a
> > >> maintenance branch for Tomee7.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> After that I'd love to roll a first TomEE8 version in say one month
> > >> from now.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Any objection?
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> LieGrue,
> > >> >> strub
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to