Hello All,

Is there any  possibility to see a TomEE 7.0.5 release anytime soon
with an up to date Johnzon 1.1.x in it ?

Best regards,
Alexandre


2018-03-04 15:12 GMT+01:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
> Oops my bad: please read in my previous mail that I just opened JOHNZON-160:
>  
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-160?jql=text%20~%20%22MapperException%22
>
> Thanks,
> Alexandre
>
> 2018-03-04 15:08 GMT+01:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
>> Hello Romain & Mark,
>>
>> Yes I already filled a generic JIRA JOHNZON-149 a while ago for asking
>> Johnzon upgrade to 1.1.x in TomEE 7.0.5.
>>
>> And I just filled JOHNZON-105 with a more specific JSON-B/Mapper issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JOHNZON/issues/JOHNZON-105?filter=allopenissues
>>
>> It would be great to have a fix for it in upcoming TomEE 7.0.5, along
>> with latest security updates on embedded components (Tomcat, etc..)
>>
>> I will provide feedbacks with our large & complex web apps as soon as
>> there's something testable as a snapshot (or I can built stuff with
>> Maven, but i'll need by steps to make sure I'm pointing to appropriate
>> repos/versions/tags)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> 2018-03-04 14:46 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>> @Mark: it is tracked on johnzon (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/JOHNZON-149).
>>> There was the proposal I did months ago to just use jsonp/b 1.1/1.0 in
>>> tomee 7 (doesnt prevent anything from tomee perspective if we drop java 7
>>> compat). If not desired we should redo 1.x from master pby to avoid an half
>>> merged branch.
>>>
>>> Le 4 mars 2018 12:40, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi Alex!
>>>>
>>>> johnzon-1.0.x is targetting JSON-P_1.0 (EE7) and johnzon-1.0.0 is indeed
>>>> the last version we shipped so far.
>>>>
>>>> johnzon-1.1.x is targetting JSON-P_1.1 and JSON-B_1.0.
>>>> Those are all EE8 specs and thus this is also the version used in TomEE8.
>>>>
>>>> If you have some urgent need/request for a fix in Johnzon-1.0.x (EE7) then
>>>> please identify the tickets you suggest to have fixed and report them on
>>>> the d...@johnzon.apache.org list.
>>>> What could work is if you go through either the tickets resolved in
>>>> various johnzon-1.1.x versions, or scan the git log for fixes you want to
>>>> have backported.
>>>> We will then discuss it over there, create tickets and then merge back the
>>>> stuff.
>>>> The Johnzon team is surely happy about every helping hand!
>>>>
>>>> Btw, that's really the same for almost all the parts of TomEE.
>>>> 85% of the tickets and improvements are really happening at all the other
>>>> projects: johnzon, bval, OpenWebBeans, OpenJPA, MyFaces, Tomcat, Geronimo,
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> Of course it's a good idea to keep the TomEE project in the loop from a
>>>> high-level perspective. For example to summarise the tickets which will get
>>>> resolved.
>>>> But the actual work + the release etc will happen on the Johnzon, OWB, etc
>>>> lists.
>>>>
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Am 03.03.2018 um 23:32 schrieb Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 for a TomEE+ 7.0.5 asap, I volonteer to test it against our large web
>>>> apps!
>>>> > By the way, TomEE+ 7.0.4 had a super old version of Johnzon (1.0.0 if
>>>> > I remember well), could 7.0.5 embedded a decently more recent Johnzon
>>>> > version to fix the tons of issues we had to hack around with Johnzon
>>>> > 1.0.0 ?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Alex
>>>> >
>>>> > 2018-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>>>> >> hi folks!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We discussed this quite some times and we got good feedback so far. So
>>>> it's finally time to make this reality.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Over the weekend I'd like to switch TomEE to master and create a
>>>> maintenance branch for Tomee7.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> After that I'd love to roll a first TomEE8 version in say one month
>>>> from now.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Any objection?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> LieGrue,
>>>> >> strub
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to