What's the other vote ("Geronimo one")?
Jon
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> How does this vote relates to the geronimo one you launched?
>
> Are they purely concurrent or can they be conditional one for the other?
>
>
> Le 19 mars 2018 01:03, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > The vote for merging PR 123 does not address community will on what to do
> > with the code beyond merging it. One can realistically vote +1 to merge
> > the code, but then desire to see the code cleaned up and moved elsewhere.
> > One can realistically desire seeing an attempt to clean up the code to
> find
> > what is reusable and may wish to withhold a final decision until we see
> how
> > fruitful such a module would be.
> >
> > Out of respect for people who may not know exactly how they feel (TomEE
> or
> > Geronimo), this is a vote for the latter.
> >
> > Vote: Should we attempt to extract code from the JWT PR to see what is
> > reusable and how successful such a jar would be?
> >
> > +1 Let's give it a shot here
> > +-0
> > -1 Let's do this elsewhere
> >
> > If the vote is +1 to attempt an extraction of reusable code here, final
> > conclusion of if that extraction is worth it or where it should live is
> not
> > being voted on. People are welcome to decide differently based on the
> > results of the exercise.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
>
