does this mean a reusable JWT library external to TomEE, or within the
TomEE project?
i have to agree with previous statements i read that TomEE is a bundle
of libraries and not really the place to locate reusable pluggable
projects. it is more like the place where you might plug a project in
once it is working
On 19/03/2018 11:39, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
What's the other vote ("Geronimo one")?
Jon
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hey David,
How does this vote relates to the geronimo one you launched?
Are they purely concurrent or can they be conditional one for the other?
Le 19 mars 2018 01:03, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
The vote for merging PR 123 does not address community will on what to do
with the code beyond merging it. One can realistically vote +1 to merge
the code, but then desire to see the code cleaned up and moved elsewhere.
One can realistically desire seeing an attempt to clean up the code to
find
what is reusable and may wish to withhold a final decision until we see
how
fruitful such a module would be.
Out of respect for people who may not know exactly how they feel (TomEE
or
Geronimo), this is a vote for the latter.
Vote: Should we attempt to extract code from the JWT PR to see what is
reusable and how successful such a jar would be?
+1 Let's give it a shot here
+-0
-1 Let's do this elsewhere
If the vote is +1 to attempt an extraction of reusable code here, final
conclusion of if that extraction is worth it or where it should live is
not
being voted on. People are welcome to decide differently based on the
results of the exercise.
-David
