I think we should keep the code in TomEE. +1
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org> wrote: > +1 Let's give it a shot here > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 2:12 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'd like to wrap this up so if you have other questions or would like to > > vote, now is the time. Reminder, you do not need to be a committer to > vote. > > > > > > -- > > David Blevins > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > On Mar 18, 2018, at 5:02 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > The vote for merging PR 123 does not address community will on what to > > do with the code beyond merging it. One can realistically vote +1 to > merge > > the code, but then desire to see the code cleaned up and moved elsewhere. > > One can realistically desire seeing an attempt to clean up the code to > find > > what is reusable and may wish to withhold a final decision until we see > how > > fruitful such a module would be. > > > > > > Out of respect for people who may not know exactly how they feel (TomEE > > or Geronimo), this is a vote for the latter. > > > > > > Vote: Should we attempt to extract code from the JWT PR to see what is > > reusable and how successful such a jar would be? > > > > > > +1 Let's give it a shot here > > > +-0 > > > -1 Let's do this elsewhere > > > > > > If the vote is +1 to attempt an extraction of reusable code here, final > > conclusion of if that extraction is worth it or where it should live is > not > > being voted on. People are welcome to decide differently based on the > > results of the exercise. > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > >
