+1 To merge on TomEE

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:38 PM Rudy De Busscher <rdebussc...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 To merge into TomEE
>
> Rudy
>
> On 29 March 2018 at 20:19, Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Cool, I didn't know I could vote as a contributor.
> >
> > I am +1 on this PR to be merged on TomEE.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on merge
> > >
> > > Bruno Baptista
> > > http://twitter.com/brunobat_
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 29-03-2018 19:13, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote:
> > >
> > >> + 1, Let's merge and move it forward.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> + 1, Let's merge.
> > >>>
> > >>> If later someone wants to move it elsewhere in the future, that's
> fine.
> > >>>
> > >>> While people figure out how to do that, at least we will have
> something
> > >>> working for the users.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers
> > >>>
> > >>> Bruno Baptista
> > >>> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 19-03-2018 00:02, David Blevins wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>    - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There are 35 commits spanning 27 days of work.  It's been reviewed
> by
> > >>>> Andy and Rudy.  One a committer and one a contributor, which is
> great
> > >>>> for
> > >>>> us.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There's an open question as to where the code should live in its
> final
> > >>>> state: TomEE or Geronimo.  This conversation doesn't seem conclusive
> > >>>> after
> > >>>> 12 days.  It's ok for us not to agree, but we should have more votes
> > so
> > >>>> there is a clear outcome and we are acting as a community to our
> best
> > >>>> ability.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Vote: Merge Pull Request 123?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>    +1  Yes, let's do it
> > >>>>    +-0 Abstain
> > >>>>    -1  No, don't put this code in TomEE
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Out of respect for the conversation, this is not a vote of where the
> > >>>> code
> > >>>> will live in its final state.  This is just a decision to merge or
> > >>>> not.  It
> > >>>> would give the users something they can try, which can be updated
> by a
> > >>>> future PR if the code does eventually move.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -David
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to