The Duplicate one is also BVal Jon. I'l looking at the rest-client part. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:55 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > JmsInjectionTests works locally > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:52 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > >> I have been digging and running tests locally. >> Here is the list of tests failures I have extracted. >> >> - JMSInjectionTest >> - CDIInvokeSimpleGetOperationTest >> - CDIInvokeWithRegisteredProviderTest >> - FeatureRegistrationTest >> - InvokeWithJsonProviderTest >> - DuplicateConfigurationTest >> - XMLConfigurationTest >> - XMLConfiguredConstraintValidatorTest >> - MoviesArquillianHtmlUnitTest >> - DeployInWebAppsDirectoryTest >> - LegacyServerTest >> - LegacyClientTest >> - (StickyConnection|RoundRobin|Random)StrategyTest >> - ReconnectDelayCaseInsensitiveTest >> - ReconnectDelayListSelfTest >> - ReconnectTest >> >> Anything else I missed? >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:43 PM Jonathan Gallimore < >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I've merged a few PRs in which appear to have kept the build in the same >>> state. I also fixed up the itest failures. I'll work on bval tomorrow. I >>> get failures with the MicroProfile REST client locally, so if someone can >>> take a look at that, that would be great. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:25 PM Roberto Cortez >>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi folks, >>> > >>> > It is great to see so many contributions and we hope to continue and >>> even >>> > increase the traffic. >>> > >>> > Now, this also comes with a few challenges. Our build has been red for >>> a >>> > while and I would like to get it green again: >>> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8?numbuilds=35 < >>> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8?numbuilds=35> >>> > >>> > The latest build has some checkstyle violations and test failures: >>> > >>> > >>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/904/steps/check-formatting/logs/stdio >>> > < >>> > >>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/904/steps/check-formatting/logs/stdio >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/904/steps/test/logs/stdio >>> > < >>> > >>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/904/steps/test/logs/stdio >>> > > >>> > >>> > It would be great if someone could pick these issues and fix them and >>> we >>> > should prioritize any build fixing PR above everything else. >>> > >>> > Also, when someone sends a PR, your work doesn’t end when it gets >>> merged. >>> > Running a full build takes almost 5 hours, so the committer most of the >>> > times is not able to run the entire build to check your PR. I kindly >>> ask >>> > you to monitor the tomee build bot here: >>> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8 < >>> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8> after your PR >>> > gets merged and if you uncover something wrong, please send a >>> corrective PR. >>> > >>> > I’ll be out the next couple of days, so I hope someone can pick this >>> up :) >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Roberto >>> >>
