I found the issue here, and fixed it. I need to check to ensure that the
change doesn't affect the wire protocol - I'm _fairly_ sure it doesn't, but
we'd need to discuss how to handle it, if it did. I should have a PR up for
review later today.

Jon



On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I added a comment to the JIRA, but I'll follow up here too. I started
> writing a test for this, and made a couple of small changes:
>
> * flipped your beans from remote to local
> * added a servlet rather than a main
> * introduced <ejb-local-ref> in ejb-jar.xml and web.xml so they can be
> looked up via java:comp/env as opposed to the global JNDI name
> put everything in a .war as opposed to .ear
>
> ... and it works.
>
> Generated .war file and source attached. I'm not entirely sure which of my
> changes has enabled it to work - my current guess is its the remote ->
> local change, but I'll dig into each one.
>
> Interesting problem - thanks for reporting it!
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:43 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I noticed this come in on JIRA:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2234
>>
>> Seems we have an issue returning more than 256 entities from a BMP
>> finder. Given that I've worked in and around this area, I'd like to work on
>> it. I'll assign it to me, but if you had a burning desire to tackle it, let
>> me know.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jon
>>
>

Reply via email to