Still testing, but here's the change: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/272. Any feedback is welcome.
Jon On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:29 AM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > I found the issue here, and fixed it. I need to check to ensure that the > change doesn't affect the wire protocol - I'm _fairly_ sure it doesn't, but > we'd need to discuss how to handle it, if it did. I should have a PR up for > review later today. > > Jon > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I added a comment to the JIRA, but I'll follow up here too. I started >> writing a test for this, and made a couple of small changes: >> >> * flipped your beans from remote to local >> * added a servlet rather than a main >> * introduced <ejb-local-ref> in ejb-jar.xml and web.xml so they can be >> looked up via java:comp/env as opposed to the global JNDI name >> put everything in a .war as opposed to .ear >> >> ... and it works. >> >> Generated .war file and source attached. I'm not entirely sure which of >> my changes has enabled it to work - my current guess is its the remote -> >> local change, but I'll dig into each one. >> >> Interesting problem - thanks for reporting it! >> >> Jon >> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:43 PM Jonathan Gallimore < >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> I noticed this come in on JIRA: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2234 >>> >>> Seems we have an issue returning more than 256 entities from a BMP >>> finder. Given that I've worked in and around this area, I'd like to work on >>> it. I'll assign it to me, but if you had a burning desire to tackle it, let >>> me know. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jon >>> >>
