Great job Jon.
I did some tests so, so we should be able to get something green hopefully
soon
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:17 PM Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> fantastic! I'll take a look on it.
>
> Nice work!
>
> Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our build
> > to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a branch
> > which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can.
> >
> > My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and broadly
> > speaking, adds these modules:
> >
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
> >         <version>2.3.0</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> >         <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
> >         <version>2.3.1</version>
> >         <type>pom</type>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>rt</artifactId>
> >         <version>2.3.1</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
> >         <version>1.2.0</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId>
> >         <version>1.2.0</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId>
> >         <version>3.9</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >       <dependency>
> >         <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> >         <version>1.0.6.Final</version>
> >       </dependency>
> >
> > There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in the
> > output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is getting
> > almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to pass.
> > Here's my current failures:
> > https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4
> >
> > In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included are:
> >
> > FastInfoSet-1.2.15
> > gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001
> > ha-api-3.1.9
> > istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7
> > jacorb-3.9
> > jacorb-omgapi-3.9
> > javax.activation-1.2.0
> > javax.activation-api-1.2.0
> > javax.annotation-api-1.3.2
> > javax.jws-api-1.1
> > javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0
> > jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > jaxws-api
> > jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec
> > management-api-3.0.0-b012
> > mimepull-1.9.10
> > policy-2.7.5
> > rt-2.3.1
> > saaj-impl-1.5.0
> > stax-ex-1.8
> > stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4)
> > streambuffer-1.5.6
> > txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438
> > woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3)
> > xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3)
> >
> > These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of
> > dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be removed,
> but
> > I'll need to work through them to figure out what.
> >
> > If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most
> welcome.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jon
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>

Reply via email to