I've merged those 2 PRs in. Let's see what the actual diff is for my branch now.
Jon On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:28 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana < [email protected]> wrote: > Hey JonG, > What do you think if you move this branch to the TomEE project? > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:40 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Great job Jon. > > I did some tests so, so we should be able to get something green > hopefully > > soon > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:17 PM Daniel Cunha <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Jon, > > > > > > fantastic! I'll take a look on it. > > > > > > Nice work! > > > > > > Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 13:26, Jonathan Gallimore < > > > [email protected]> escreveu: > > > > > > > Its very much a work in progress, but I have been trying to get our > > build > > > > to run on Java 11, with the full set of tests. I'm doing this in a > > branch > > > > which I have been keeping up to date with master as best as I can. > > > > > > > > My code is here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293, and > broadly > > > > speaking, adds these modules: > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId> > > > > <version>2.3.0</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId> > > > > <version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId> > > > > <version>2.3.1</version> > > > > <type>pom</type> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>rt</artifactId> > > > > <version>2.3.1</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId> > > > > <version>1.2.0</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>javax.activation</artifactId> > > > > <version>1.2.0</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>org.jacorb</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>jacorb</artifactId> > > > > <version>3.9</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>org.jboss.spec.javax.rmi</groupId> > > > > <artifactId>jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec</artifactId> > > > > <version>1.0.6.Final</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > There are some regressions to look at, and there are some errors in > the > > > > output that need looking at, but one milestone I have reached is > > getting > > > > almost all the arquillian tests (only 1 failure) in the build to > pass. > > > > Here's my current failures: > > > > https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/6968379060a4d4b25f2b6c888a49bbb4 > > > > > > > > In terms of the build artifacts, the additional libraries included > are: > > > > > > > > FastInfoSet-1.2.15 > > > > gmbal-api-only-3,1,0-b001 > > > > ha-api-3.1.9 > > > > istack-commons-runtime-3.0.7 > > > > jacorb-3.9 > > > > jacorb-omgapi-3.9 > > > > javax.activation-1.2.0 > > > > javax.activation-api-1.2.0 > > > > javax.annotation-api-1.3.2 > > > > javax.jws-api-1.1 > > > > javax.xml.soap-api-1.4.0 > > > > jaxb-runtime-2.4.0-b180830.0438 > > > > jaxws-api > > > > jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec > > > > management-api-3.0.0-b012 > > > > mimepull-1.9.10 > > > > policy-2.7.5 > > > > rt-2.3.1 > > > > saaj-impl-1.5.0 > > > > stax-ex-1.8 > > > > stax2-api-4.1 (as opposed to 3.1.4) > > > > streambuffer-1.5.6 > > > > txw2-2.4.0-b180830.0438 > > > > woodstox-core-5.1.0 (as opposed to 5.0.3) > > > > xmlschema-core-2.2.4 (as opposed to 2.2.3) > > > > > > > > These are obviously being pulled in as transitive dependencies of > > > > dependencies I mention above, and I'm sure some of them can be > removed, > > > but > > > > I'll need to work through them to figure out what. > > > > > > > > If folks would like to collaborate on this here, it would be most > > > welcome. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel "soro" Cunha > > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > > > > > >
