i would like to see a M2, too isnt there a way to get a M1 or RC1 from CXF guys?
Am Di., 18. Juni 2024 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected] >: > Any other thoughts? > > @JL: Do you want the Geronimo mail implant release (ongoing vote) to be > included in an M2? > > @Jon: Think it would be worth to include > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1166 ? > > > > Am 12.06.2024 um 20:38 schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi Markus, > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > I think we need to keep the Java 17 baseline anyway (we need it for > activemq). The CXF downgrade is just a matter of reverting two commits, so > should be the most easiest option. > > > > I asked CXF, what they plan for 4.1.0 here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rggjhm3w4gr81y8dmskp4mc7cydq13zq > > If one looks into their Jira / EE10 ticket, the current statement is > „somewhere this year“. So I wouldn’t count with it soon. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > >> Am 12.06.2024 um 19:02 schrieb Markus Jung <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Hey Richard, > >> > >> huge +1 from my side for an M2 when my OIDC PR is merged, that would > allow us to become the first real user of this feature ASAP and probably > provide some more feedback and patches ;) > >> > >> Don't know how likely a CXF 4.1.0 release/milestone is in the near > future, I'm fine if we downgrade again for now. However, my OIDC code > already uses some language features not available in Java 11. So I think we > need to keep Java 17 as a requirement. > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Markus > >> > >>> On 12. Jun 2024, at 06:17, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Here is a new update on TomEE 10. > >>> > >>> Markus Jung has implemented the missing part of the EE10 security > spec: [1] and the TCK for it looks good. Thanks a lot for that > contribution! If anybody wants to give it a review, you find it here: [1] > >>> > >>> We have updated most MicroProfile specs to be compliant with MP6 and > the TCK for it looks good. > >>> > >>> The only MicroProfile implementation missing is OpenTelemetry 1.0 [2] > (and the removal of OpenTracing). There is a branch with a basic > integration (TOMEE-4343) but while working on it, I found something odd, > which I did discuss with Romain via Slack. The result is [3]. I hope to get > some additional input from Mark Struberg on it, so we can hopefully find a > way to fix the odd CDI part here. Overall, the related TCK has around 4-5 > which are (most likely) a result of [3] because the interceptor is not > working as expected. > >>> > >>> Since we are more and more in a (better) EE10 shape, we need to go > back into fixing/adding the existing/remaining TCKs inside the TomEE build > to see, if we need to do some work in our upstream dependencies. I am > planning to send an update for that area soon, so we get an overview of > what is already added and what is broken / missing, > >>> > >>> We are blocked by a release of CXF 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT. > >>> > >>> We should (imho) discuss, if it is worth to release a M2 with a > downgrade to the latest stable CXF release since we added new features > (MicroProfile updates, potentially OIDC soon) and upgraded a lot of 3rd > party CVEs. So from my POV it would be crucial to get some feedback on a > new milestone release. WDYT? > >>> > >>> Gruß > >>> Richard > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1178 > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4343 > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1441 > >> > >> > > > >
