Hi, I think the CXF guys won't do a milestone / release in the next few weeks.
So we have two options: (a) Downgrade to 4.0.4 (b) Fork from CXF 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT and release something indermediate under org.apache.tomee (c) ?? Any thoughts? Do we have alternatives? Gruß Richard [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rggjhm3w4gr81y8dmskp4mc7cydq13zq [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/pcddpwrr3jjxccsvyp27spjr1gmbljov On 2024/06/18 09:43:47 Thomas Andraschko wrote: > i would like to see a M2, too > > isnt there a way to get a M1 or RC1 from CXF guys? > > Am Di., 18. Juni 2024 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org > >: > > > Any other thoughts? > > > > @JL: Do you want the Geronimo mail implant release (ongoing vote) to be > > included in an M2? > > > > @Jon: Think it would be worth to include > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1166 ? > > > > > > > Am 12.06.2024 um 20:38 schrieb Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com>: > > > > > > Hi Markus, > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > > > I think we need to keep the Java 17 baseline anyway (we need it for > > activemq). The CXF downgrade is just a matter of reverting two commits, so > > should be the most easiest option. > > > > > > I asked CXF, what they plan for 4.1.0 here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rggjhm3w4gr81y8dmskp4mc7cydq13zq > > > If one looks into their Jira / EE10 ticket, the current statement is > > „somewhere this year“. So I wouldn’t count with it soon. > > > > > > Gruß > > > Richard > > > > > > > > >> Am 12.06.2024 um 19:02 schrieb Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org>: > > >> > > >> Hey Richard, > > >> > > >> huge +1 from my side for an M2 when my OIDC PR is merged, that would > > allow us to become the first real user of this feature ASAP and probably > > provide some more feedback and patches ;) > > >> > > >> Don't know how likely a CXF 4.1.0 release/milestone is in the near > > future, I'm fine if we downgrade again for now. However, my OIDC code > > already uses some language features not available in Java 11. So I think we > > need to keep Java 17 as a requirement. > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> Markus > > >> > > >>> On 12. Jun 2024, at 06:17, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> Here is a new update on TomEE 10. > > >>> > > >>> Markus Jung has implemented the missing part of the EE10 security > > spec: [1] and the TCK for it looks good. Thanks a lot for that > > contribution! If anybody wants to give it a review, you find it here: [1] > > >>> > > >>> We have updated most MicroProfile specs to be compliant with MP6 and > > the TCK for it looks good. > > >>> > > >>> The only MicroProfile implementation missing is OpenTelemetry 1.0 [2] > > (and the removal of OpenTracing). There is a branch with a basic > > integration (TOMEE-4343) but while working on it, I found something odd, > > which I did discuss with Romain via Slack. The result is [3]. I hope to get > > some additional input from Mark Struberg on it, so we can hopefully find a > > way to fix the odd CDI part here. Overall, the related TCK has around 4-5 > > which are (most likely) a result of [3] because the interceptor is not > > working as expected. > > >>> > > >>> Since we are more and more in a (better) EE10 shape, we need to go > > back into fixing/adding the existing/remaining TCKs inside the TomEE build > > to see, if we need to do some work in our upstream dependencies. I am > > planning to send an update for that area soon, so we get an overview of > > what is already added and what is broken / missing, > > >>> > > >>> We are blocked by a release of CXF 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT. > > >>> > > >>> We should (imho) discuss, if it is worth to release a M2 with a > > downgrade to the latest stable CXF release since we added new features > > (MicroProfile updates, potentially OIDC soon) and upgraded a lot of 3rd > > party CVEs. So from my POV it would be crucial to get some feedback on a > > new milestone release. WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> Gruß > > >>> Richard > > >>> > > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1178 > > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4343 > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1441 > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >
