On 04/12/2009 23:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Did anyone in this discussion propose libtool? I didn't see it. > (You can use automake without libtool) > > Grüße/Regards, > > Rene
>> On 04/12/2009 18:41, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >>> Hi Bjoern, *, >>> >>> In line with that, why not using autotools? It's ugly, it has many >>> drawbacks, but it's _the_ standard for FLOSS. Plus, it has excellent >>> cross-build capabilities, something I consider increasingly >>> important. so, i always thought that "GNU autotools" is short for "GNU autoconf + GNU automake + GNU libtool". am i wrong here? is there an official definition somewhere? wikipedia says (GNU_build_system): <quote> The GNU build system comprises the GNU utility programs Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool. </quote> regards, michael -- "That's right!" shouted Vroomfondel, "we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org
