makes perfect sense to me On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:42 PM Fieck, Brennan <brennan_fi...@comcast.com> wrote:
> Can anybody think of a reason why the ATC 3.x docs should include the > pages for migrating from 1.x to 2.x or from 2.0 to 2.2? IMO the docs for > version X.y should include instructions that pertain to version X - so an > upgrade from X-1 to X would be fine, but from X-1.y to X-1.y+z doesn't > really make sense. > > To be clear, I'm suggesting the removal of > > > https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/migration_from_10_to_20.html > and > > > https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/migration_from_20_to_22.html > > > from the latest (3.x) docs. > >
