I disagree, we don't support many of our old versions and we don't even
provide the release on our release page.

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:40 AM Robert Butts <r...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 on a footnote. Otherwise, it's going to be a pain for someone to dig
> through every version of the docs to upgrade an old version.
>
> Links would be even better.
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:18 PM Gray, Jonathan <jonathan_g...@comcast.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would consider keeping a footnote somewhere that outlines any upgrade
> > sequence requirements such as 1.0 -> 1.12 -> 2.0 -> 2.21 -> 3.0.  Mostly
> > just so that if you do find yourself inheriting an antique setup that
> must
> > be maintained in place you know how many hops you should be looking for.
> > That said, agreed that old docs can live in old builds in general.
> >
> > Jonathan G
> >
> >
> > On 1/8/19, 4:58 PM, "Rawlin Peters" <rawlin.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     +1, old docs will always be available in the old releases if they
> >     still need to be referenced. In general I think that should be a
> >     documentation guideline for the project, so that whenever we cut a
> >     release branch we can (and should) freely remove documentation from
> >     master that does not pertain to whatever the next release is going to
> >     be.
> >
> >     - Rawlin
> >
> >     On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:56 PM Jeremy Mitchell <
> mitchell...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     > makes perfect sense to me
> >     >
> >     > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:42 PM Fieck, Brennan <
> > brennan_fi...@comcast.com>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >
> >     > > Can anybody think of a reason why the ATC 3.x docs should include
> > the
> >     > > pages for migrating from 1.x to 2.x or from 2.0 to 2.2? IMO the
> > docs for
> >     > > version X.y should include instructions that pertain to version X
> > - so an
> >     > > upgrade from X-1 to X would be fine, but from X-1.y to X-1.y+z
> > doesn't
> >     > > really make sense.
> >     > >
> >     > > To be clear, I'm suggesting the removal of
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >
> https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/migration_from_10_to_20.html
> >     > > and
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >
> https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/migration_from_20_to_22.html
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > from the latest (3.x) docs.
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to