Submit a PR to remove them. Anything < 2.2 is not officially supported anyway.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:56 PM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> wrote: > makes perfect sense to me > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:42 PM Fieck, Brennan <brennan_fi...@comcast.com> > wrote: > > > Can anybody think of a reason why the ATC 3.x docs should include the > > pages for migrating from 1.x to 2.x or from 2.0 to 2.2? IMO the docs for > > version X.y should include instructions that pertain to version X - so an > > upgrade from X-1 to X would be fine, but from X-1.y to X-1.y+z doesn't > > really make sense. > > > > To be clear, I'm suggesting the removal of > > > > > > > https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/migration_from_10_to_20.html > > and > > > > > > > https://traffic-control-cdn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/traffic_ops/migration_from_20_to_22.html > > > > > > from the latest (3.x) docs. > > > > >
