So I, personally, would prefer a 7.1 with an API 4.1 to provide the backwards compatibility jonathan speaks of...unless there is something that absolutely requires api 5.x..
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:53 AM Gray, Jonathan <jonathan_g...@comcast.com.invalid> wrote: > The lack of TO API backward compatibility support is causing me whiplash > as a consumer of that API and continues to add development and support > costs with each upgrade. > > Jonathan G > > From: Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@apache.org> > Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 10:10 AM > To: dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org <dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] TC 8.0.0 > I was just curious what the justification for TC 8.0 was. We are rolling > majors pretty quick (not sure that's a bad thing) and was just wondering if > there was a "big" change i was unaware of and apologies for missing the > working group where this was probably discussed. > > I'm guessing i know the reason: TO API 5.x? which does worry me a bit > because i believe that means API 3.x will be deprecated / on the chopping > block. > > Jeremy >
