Where can i find ported by Eric Pugh code? 2008/1/28, Peter Courcoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Andrey, > > Eric Pugh ported the pipeline code from turbine 3 to turbine 2.4. > However, I think that there was some form of conditional valve in > Turbine 3 which he did not move over. > > I don't know if the pipeline as used by scarab needs the conditional > valve or if it will work with the 2.4 pipeline. I can say that I am > using the pipeline in 2.4 successfully in production. > > I dimly remember posting a link to the archived cvs turbine 3 code to > the turbine mailing list. Maybe you can do a search and find it. > > Regards, > > Peter > > Andrey Larionov wrote: > > I havent experience in turbine development, but as i know pipeline in > > Turbine 3 was a central conf part of flowcontrol. How it presented in > > 2.3/2.4 how pipeline can be refactored in not pipeline form? > > > > I'm just want to back Scarab in well featured mainstream Tubine. Also > > 3Alpha has many dependency injections, which makes impossible to > > replace components of Scarab step by step. > > > > 2008/1/28, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Andrey Larionov wrote: > >>> Many years ago there is a branch Turbine 3.0, which was killed. But it > >>> used in development of Scarab. Can anybody explain: > >>> * Is it possible to revert appclication back in mainstream branch? > >>> * How many changes need to be done? (In common) > >>> > >> It would be difficult to answer those questions. I assume that > >> somewhere there exists a read only version of the ASF cvs repository, > >> from before Subversion was introduced (I know that we did not bring > >> turbine-3 across). I guess you could look at the change log for turbine > >> 3 and see how it compares to turbine 2.3/2.4. > >> > >> I think the main feature of turbine 3 that has not been implemented for > >> turbine 2.4 is the pipeline concept, but remember that 2,4 is kind of in > >> flux at present also (basically there are a bunch of things we have done > >> in 2.3 that we need to port forward and there are a few further things > >> that need to be tidied up before 2.4 would be in a satisfactory state to > >> adopt. > >> > >> I seem to recall that Eric Pugh was for a while working on Scarab and > >> Turbine with a view to getting Scarab working on 2.4 (I think). It > >> might be helpful to track him down for his thoughts on this subject > >> (looks like he is doing RoR now). > >> > >> HTH, > >> > >> Scott > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
