I havent experience in turbine development, but as i know pipeline in Turbine 3 was a central conf part of flowcontrol. How it presented in 2.3/2.4 how pipeline can be refactored in not pipeline form?
I'm just want to back Scarab in well featured mainstream Tubine. Also 3Alpha has many dependency injections, which makes impossible to replace components of Scarab step by step. 2008/1/28, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Andrey Larionov wrote: > > Many years ago there is a branch Turbine 3.0, which was killed. But it > > used in development of Scarab. Can anybody explain: > > * Is it possible to revert appclication back in mainstream branch? > > * How many changes need to be done? (In common) > > > It would be difficult to answer those questions. I assume that > somewhere there exists a read only version of the ASF cvs repository, > from before Subversion was introduced (I know that we did not bring > turbine-3 across). I guess you could look at the change log for turbine > 3 and see how it compares to turbine 2.3/2.4. > > I think the main feature of turbine 3 that has not been implemented for > turbine 2.4 is the pipeline concept, but remember that 2,4 is kind of in > flux at present also (basically there are a bunch of things we have done > in 2.3 that we need to port forward and there are a few further things > that need to be tidied up before 2.4 would be in a satisfactory state to > adopt. > > I seem to recall that Eric Pugh was for a while working on Scarab and > Turbine with a view to getting Scarab working on 2.4 (I think). It > might be helpful to track him down for his thoughts on this subject > (looks like he is doing RoR now). > > HTH, > > Scott > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
