On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> However if we, as a group, think having less modules in > the build is more important then I'll concede the point. I would like > to keep it separate for the moment while we tidy the binding though. > > Simon > There is an alternative, perhaps we should bring up the aggregate jars from 1.x into the 2.x code as a complement to the current 2.x module break down. That way those who like making packages as modules can go wild and those who like fewer jars can use the same trunk code just repackaged. ...ant
