On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 10:25 AM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:48 AM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:25 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thats all very useful but i think its a slightly different topic - one
>>>> thing that was wanted here was a way to create an isolated Node
>>>> instance thats _not_ part of any domain, so yes there's lots of
>>>> different ways we can have for building a domain but don't have any
>>>> API for creating standalone Nodes.
>>>>
>>>>   ...ant
>>>>
>>>
>>> What's the difference of a Domain with a single node and a standalone
>>> node that's _not_ part of any domain ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> For practical purposes not so much. Each domain would need its own
>> unique name but if thats ok then it seems like a fine way to do it to
>> me. I don't yet quite really understand the purpose of the "node name"
>> label when starting composites as discussed in [1] but if each node is
>> really in its own domain i wonder if "node name" could be replaced
>> with "domain name" and then a user can have started composites each in
>> their own domain or have multiple composites in the same domain if
>> they choose.
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>> [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/vznaimmhc7jfxtj2
>>
>
> So if we did do that the commands could be something like the following:
>
>  help
>  install <domain> [<uri>] <contributionURL> [-norun -metadata <url>
> -duris <uri,uri,...>]
>  installed <domain> [<contributionURI>]
>  remove <domain> <contributionURI>
>  addDeploymentComposite <domain> <contributionURI> <contentURL>
>  printDomainLevelComposite <domain>
>  start <domain> <curi> <compositeUri>
>  status <domain> [<curi> <compositeUri>]
>  stop <domain> [<curi> <compositeUri>]
>  bye
>
> Any comments/alternatives/updates on that?
>
>   ...ant
>

No comments after a week so i'll go start on it, can update as it goes
along if there are updates later.

   ...ant

Reply via email to