On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) I don't think your "fix" is right. As I explained before, the > sca-contribution.xml can contain composites that are packaged in other > contributions. What if we have c1 in the local contribution, and c2 in > another contribution? Are you returning one resolved Composite and another > unresolved Composite? >
I think its fine. I'm not sure that having a deployable element to a composite outside of the contribution is actually valid but even if it is i think its quite reasonable that the deployables list contains the actual correct Composite objects be they resolved or unresolved. ...ant
