On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote: > Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> I've looked at the modules, samples and tools directories as released >>> in 1.6, and I've also looked at the contents of the maven repo. >>> >>> (cut) >> >> The *-dojo modules should not be removed. There is an issue if we have >> both javascript frameworks on the binary distro and how we choose the >> default one. I believe a very similar issue happens with >> binding-sca-corba and binding-sca-jms extensions and host-tomcat. >> > It should be fine to have the dojo modules in the modules directory > of the binary distro as long as they aren't included in tuscany-sca-all > or tuscany-sca-manifest. They can be picked up by explicit references > from a build.xml file generated by tuscany-maven-ant-generator. > > I've tried this approach to run the store-dojo sample and it works fine > using the generated build.xml file. I also had to change the host-tomcat > dependency to a host-jetty dependency because the 3rdparty tomcat > dependencies aren't included in the binary distro. I tried the store > sample as well, and the extra modules didn't cause any problems. > > I'd like to add the dojo modules to the modules directory of the binary > distro and add the store-dojo sample to show how to use these modules. > This is much simpler than requiring users to download these modules manually > from the maven repo and figure out how to use them. I would include a note > in the release documentation explaining why these modules can't be part of > tuscany-sca-all and tuscany-sca-manifest. Is there agreement on this? > > Simon >
+1 -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
