How does the shell operate with webapps? I've tried loading
helloworld-webapp with mvn tuscany:run and I got a ClassNotFoundException on
a jetty related class. I've added jetty dependencies to the shell module and
now i'm getting:
Feb 7, 2011 8:33:48 PM
org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.runtime.impl.EndpointReferenceBinderImpl []
(ComponentReferenceTargetNotFound)
WARNING: Component reference target not found at deployment time, it might
be a remote service elsewhere in the SCA Domain so well try and resolve it
again at runtime: {1}
2011-02-07 20:33:48.163::INFO: Logging to STDERR via
org.mortbay.log.StdErrLog
Embedded error: org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.ActivationException:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
Could you give me some tips on what to do next?
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Florian Moga <moga....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I gave it a try and it found the same problem. It looks like it is not
> expected that the junit jar to be specified amongst dependencies but in the
> $ANT_HOME/lib folder... I've added the build.test.classpath to the
> test-junit-present target and tests are working now.
>
> <target name="test-junit-present">
> <available classname="junit.framework.Test" property="junit.present">
> <classpath refid="build.test.classpath"/>
> </available>
> </target>
>
> After that, at the package target I'm getting "maven-build.xml:250:
> Attributes must have name and value" and I cannot find what it's all about.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Florian MOGA <moga....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I've just checked out "mvn ant:ant" and seems to do a decent job in
>> > generating an ant build file.
>>
>> I didn't know about "mvn ant:ant" that does look good. I haven't quite
>> got it to work properly yet though, if i run "mvn ant:ant" in
>> getting-started/helloworld-contribution it all seems to work but then
>> when running it fails to run the unit tests saying junit isn't
>> available, which is odd as it seems to download junit ok and looks
>> like it is where it says its looking. Does that work for anyone else?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
>
