On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Florian Moga <moga....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe it's time to take a decision so we all know where we're heading. From >> what I see we've got 2 options: >> 1/ do the release now according to Mike's suggestion >> 2/ discuss documentation and sample structure and launchers, review and >> update all samples accordingly, do the release >> I tend to go with 1/ as it gives us the possibility to do more frequent >> releases, to incrementally improve the quality of our samples and doesn't >> imply a big effort which we don't afford at the moment. However, I'm not >> opposing to 2/ if everybody else agrees on this option as I'm not directly >> affected if the release is shipped in 1 week or 1 month. >> > > I don't mind making an RC3 according to the 1/ approach this weekend, > i have everything set up still from RC1+2 so it wont take too long. > But i would first like to see a few others agree to the approach as > I'd like to try to avoid spending more time on another RC only to have > someone complain that some sample is missing and want yet another > respin. > > ...ant >
If people want to see Beta2 go out now that fine by me but we've had some good discussions on the samples over the last few days so it would be good to get straight on with a Beta3 and make samples the focus of that. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
