Don't we prefer to use a JAX-WS based implementation as the default binding-ws-runtime?
Thanks, Raymond ________________________________________________________________ Raymond Feng rf...@apache.org Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com ________________________________________________________________ On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:11 PM, ant elder wrote: > I'd like to rename the binding-ws-runtime-axis2 module to > binding-ws-runtime so that it matches the naming used by the other > extension which makes it more obvious for users. And also to move the > other binding-ws-runtime-* modules to contrib as they've fallen behind > and no one seem to be working on them. > > I'll do this in a couple of days unless anyone has an good reason not to. > > ...ant
