On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Mike Edwards <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2011 21:44, Raymond Feng wrote: >> >> Don't we prefer to use a JAX-WS based implementation as the default >> binding-ws-runtime? >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> /________________________________________________________________ > > Folks, > > No problem with the renaming - but as for preferring the JAX-WS impl, I > don't agree with that - the Axis binding implementation is the "complete" > one at the moment - and is very much the route for the various policy > options including security and reliable messaging. > > Why would a JAX-WS implementation be a better way to go? >
The main advantage of it is that its included in Java SE so there are no other external dependencies which makes it very easy to use. But I agree the Axis2 one is much more complete and seems a better choice. There are quite a lot of issues with the JAXWS RI based one, i'd be surprised if anyone is using it for more than simple helloworld demo type things. ...ant
