If you mean the binding-ws-runtime-jaxws-ri module which uses the base JDK6 classes then yes i agree that would be ideal but it doesn't work very well yet, the axis2 based binding is the only one that works completely presently, eg http://apache.markmail.org/message/75njrpcrsizxkhdo
...ant On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't we prefer to use a JAX-WS based implementation as the default > binding-ws-runtime? > Thanks, > Raymond > ________________________________________________________________ > Raymond Feng > rf...@apache.org > Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > ________________________________________________________________ > On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:11 PM, ant elder wrote: > > I'd like to rename the binding-ws-runtime-axis2 module to > binding-ws-runtime so that it matches the naming used by the other > extension which makes it more obvious for users. And also to move the > other binding-ws-runtime-* modules to contrib as they've fallen behind > and no one seem to be working on them. > > I'll do this in a couple of days unless anyone has an good reason not to. > > ...ant > >
