Am 05.08.2013 um 16:02 schrieb Marshall Schor <[email protected]>: > On 8/5/2013 9:22 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >> Thanks :) I think that UIMA-3141 or rather the discussion is spawned >> may go on for longer. Lets do 2.4.2 without resolving UIMA-3141 first. >> >> Or let take the opportunity and call it 2.5.0 this time? ;) > This is a hard choice to balance: > 1) indicating that it is substantially different from the 2.4.0 level (new > features) > 2) the x.x.0 level usually means the big delta, with more likely bugs yet to > be found, while > the x.x.2 level usually means a bug fix (as we've discussed earlier). > > I think I'm leaning toward 2.4.2, but if others have strong rationalizations, > for 2.5.0, please reply :-)
For curiosity: what will it take to do a UIMA 3.0.0? Just to get a glimpse at the other end of the spectrum. -- Richard
