Hi Thilo, Are you going to share your crud-list? Enquiring Minds Need To Know!
Eddie On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Thilo Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/05/2013 04:21 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > >> Am 05.08.2013 um 16:02 schrieb Marshall Schor <[email protected]>: >> >> On 8/5/2013 9:22 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks :) I think that UIMA-3141 or rather the discussion is spawned >>>> may go on for longer. Lets do 2.4.2 without resolving UIMA-3141 first. >>>> >>>> Or let take the opportunity and call it 2.5.0 this time? ;) >>>> >>> This is a hard choice to balance: >>> 1) indicating that it is substantially different from the 2.4.0 level >>> (new >>> features) >>> 2) the x.x.0 level usually means the big delta, with more likely bugs >>> yet to >>> be found, while >>> the x.x.2 level usually means a bug fix (as we've discussed >>> earlier). >>> >>> I think I'm leaning toward 2.4.2, but if others have strong >>> rationalizations, >>> for 2.5.0, please reply :-) >>> >> >> For curiosity: what will it take to do a UIMA 3.0.0? Just to get a >> glimpse at the >> other end of the spectrum. >> >> -- Richard >> >> > Let me know when you're ready to consider a new version that > throws away some of the old crud. > > --Thilo > >
