On 8/5/2013 10:21 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > Am 05.08.2013 um 16:02 schrieb Marshall Schor <[email protected]>: > >> On 8/5/2013 9:22 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>> Thanks :) I think that UIMA-3141 or rather the discussion is spawned >>> may go on for longer. Lets do 2.4.2 without resolving UIMA-3141 first. >>> >>> Or let take the opportunity and call it 2.5.0 this time? ;) >> This is a hard choice to balance: >> 1) indicating that it is substantially different from the 2.4.0 level (new >> features) >> 2) the x.x.0 level usually means the big delta, with more likely bugs yet >> to >> be found, while >> the x.x.2 level usually means a bug fix (as we've discussed earlier). >> >> I think I'm leaning toward 2.4.2, but if others have strong rationalizations, >> for 2.5.0, please reply :-) > For curiosity: what will it take to do a UIMA 3.0.0? Just to get a glimpse at > the > other end of the spectrum.
I'll let others answer this :-). It's the kind of thing, for me, that one would recognize, when it happens. -Marshall > > -- Richard
