hmmm, this goes against one of the apache "requirements": This page: http://apache.org/dev/writable-git says
ASF releases *must* be cut from the canonical ASF Git repositories. Part of this page has some out of date links, but I'm guess this means that when you do a release, you start by cloning from gitbox.apache one, not the GitHub one. Do you agree? or did I read this wrong? -Marshall On 9/4/2019 9:38 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 4. Sep 2019, at 15:34, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: >> 3) Both of these repos (github and gitbox.apache...) can be used as git >> remotes. GitHub comes with github extras - such as issues (we don't use, we >> use >> jira). I'm not sure if git pull requests are available on gitbox.apache. > To avoid potential problems, I'd suggest we all stick to using a single > remote, namely > the GitHub one in order to be able to profit immediately from the PR > capabilities. > > The "issues" feature on the GitHub repo is turned off, only the PRs are > enabled. > > -- Richard
