All,

I sent a mail out earlier, but I think it got stuck in mod limbo.

I'm confused a bit by what's out on master.  Anyone know why we have a
1.0.1-SNAPSHOT on master?

John

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:47 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Lewis,
>
> Thanks for bumping this thread. I would like to help get a release out as
> soon as possible and I'm willing to volunteer as release manager. I can
> probably get a first release candidate ready next week.
>
> I think calling it 1.0.2 is probably best because there are bug fixes and
> minor improvements, but no major new features (unless you count the Central
> SSO feature, but it's not really usable until the portal supports Central
> SSO).
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:27 PM Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> > I think this thread has kinda died somewhat, however i want to revisit
> it.
> > Is there any motivation to drive the next 1.X release?
> > @Todd,
> > Do you have any comments on my previous reply?
> > Thanks folks.
> > Lewis
> >
> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Todd,
> > >
> > > Another thing I am thinking... is this a blocker to a release? To me it
> > > sounds like a feature as oppose to something which would block an
> > > incubating release.
> > > I would like to suggest that we move towards releasing
> > > Usergrid-1.1-incubating as is unless there are blocking reasons for not
> > > doing so.
> > > I think Usergrid should aim to graduate reasonably soon.
> > > What do you think? Have a great weekend.
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:01 AM, <
> > > dev-digest-h...@usergrid.incubator.apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> We're working on adding a central sign on capability to 1.0 and will
> > >> release it soon. Dave has been doing this, it seems we just need to do
> > >> better bookkeeping so that everyone is aware we're adding
> functionality
> > to
> > >> our 1.0 stack.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
> >
>

Reply via email to