Actually if you give me two days I think I can get binaries to create properly in the release.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:39 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Would anyone mind if I fix that and remove the legacy java sdk from the > stack module list? > > John > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:24 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm not sure what is up with that. Our last release was 1.0.1, so master >> should be 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT. >> >> - Dave >> >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:57 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > All, >> > >> > I sent a mail out earlier, but I think it got stuck in mod limbo. >> > >> > I'm confused a bit by what's out on master. Anyone know why we have a >> > 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT on master? >> > >> > John >> > >> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:47 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Lewis, >> > > >> > > Thanks for bumping this thread. I would like to help get a release >> out as >> > > soon as possible and I'm willing to volunteer as release manager. I >> can >> > > probably get a first release candidate ready next week. >> > > >> > > I think calling it 1.0.2 is probably best because there are bug fixes >> and >> > > minor improvements, but no major new features (unless you count the >> > Central >> > > SSO feature, but it's not really usable until the portal supports >> Central >> > > SSO). >> > > >> > > Dave >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:27 PM Lewis John Mcgibbney < >> > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Folks, >> > > > I think this thread has kinda died somewhat, however i want to >> revisit >> > > it. >> > > > Is there any motivation to drive the next 1.X release? >> > > > @Todd, >> > > > Do you have any comments on my previous reply? >> > > > Thanks folks. >> > > > Lewis >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >> > > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Todd, >> > > > > >> > > > > Another thing I am thinking... is this a blocker to a release? To >> me >> > it >> > > > > sounds like a feature as oppose to something which would block an >> > > > > incubating release. >> > > > > I would like to suggest that we move towards releasing >> > > > > Usergrid-1.1-incubating as is unless there are blocking reasons >> for >> > not >> > > > > doing so. >> > > > > I think Usergrid should aim to graduate reasonably soon. >> > > > > What do you think? Have a great weekend. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:01 AM, < >> > > > > dev-digest-h...@usergrid.incubator.apache.org> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> We're working on adding a central sign on capability to 1.0 and >> will >> > > > >> release it soon. Dave has been doing this, it seems we just need >> to >> > do >> > > > >> better bookkeeping so that everyone is aware we're adding >> > > functionality >> > > > to >> > > > >> our 1.0 stack. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > *Lewis* >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
