Agree that Todd or Dave are great candidates.  Of course, it's not a draft, so 
need to see who actually wants it.

I've been watching the whole diversity thread on the Incubator list and there 
does seem to be some polarized opinions.  I think it would be useful to review 
the recent commentary around other proposed graduations to see how we fare 
regard to that as well as the other issues.

Ed

> On Jul 25, 2015, at 3:53 PM, Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 for Dave or Todd
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rod Simpson
> 
> On July 25, 2015 at 11:28:17 AM, John D. Ament ([email protected]) wrote:
> 
> A few comments in line (I was going to email to see what the status was,  
> then noticed it was in git, then saw this mail... slowly catching up).  
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM Dave <[email protected]> wrote:  
>> 
>> Now that I have updated the project status page (usergrid.xml) to include  
>> all committers and their users (  
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/usergrid.html -- not sure why it has  
>> not updated yet), I believe we are ready to move ahead with graduation.  
>> 
>> Graduation to a top level project requires:  
>> - a charter for your project  
>> - a positive community graduation VOTE  
>> - a positive IPMC recommendation VOTE  
>> - the acceptance of the resolution by the Board  
>> (link: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#process)  
>> 
>> I have put together a DRAFT charter here:  
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/tlp-resolution.txt  
>> 
>> To complete the charter we need to decide who will be the Project  
>> Management Committee (PMC) chair, aka VP Apache Usergrid. This person will  
>> be the ASF Board of Directors eyes and ears on the project and will be  
>> responsible for writing the project status report every couple of months,  
>> ensuring that Apache policies are being followed and when appropriate  
>> raising issues to the attention of the board. The chair has no special  
>> authority to make technical decisions or direct the project.  
>> 
>> So, for discussion:  
>> 
>> * Are we really truly ready to gradate?  
> 
> The only concern I can see coming up is a diverse enough community. Its  
> come up a few times with recent graduations, so let's make sure. I think  
> everything else has been resolved, so we're good.  
> 
> 
>> 
>> * What else do we need to do before we graduate?  
> * Should we ask all committers if they want to remain in project? (we  
>> haven't heard from some in a while, and one does not have an account)  
> Yes, you should. In addition, I would like to see a distinct list of  
> PMC/Committers in the resolution, even if its mostly the same.  
> 
> 
>> * Nominations for PMC chair?  
> 
> My nominations are:  
> - Dave  
> - Todd  
> 
> 
>> 
>> * Any other concerns? Mentors?  
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,  
>> Dave  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:50 PM Dave <[email protected]> wrote:  
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the delayed response.  
>>> 
>>> I was waiting for after the 1.0.2 release to join this discussion and now  
>>> that 1.0.2 is going out to the mirrors, I think we are ready to propose  
>>> graduation. We should figure out the next steps and move quickly towards  
>> a  
>>> graduation vote.  
>>> 
>>> - Dave  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM Shawn Feldman <[email protected]>  
>>> wrote:  
>>> 
>>>> Scott used to work full time on the project so not mistaken. Not sure  
>> who  
>>>> Alberto is  
>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:29 AM John D. Ament <[email protected]>  
>>>> wrote:  
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:26 AM John D. Ament <[email protected]  
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I notice that [1] is still not up to date with committer's IDs.  
>> Came  
>>>> up  
>>>>>> last time graduation was discussed. I just committed some fixes  
>>>> based on  
>>>>>> IDs I could look up at [2], it looks like we have one case with a  
>>>> person  
>>>>>> who never reconciled their CLA (Alberto Leal). That can be  
>> addressed  
>>>> in  
>>>>>> graduation with regard to who the initial PMC and committers are.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also note - Scott Ganyo is listed on the committer index, HOWEVER, he  
>>>> does  
>>>>> not show as incubator, which he should show, so I'm not sure if it's a  
>>>> case  
>>>>> of mistaken identity or what.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think it is time for Usergrid to graduate.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> John  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/usergrid.html  
>>>>>> [2]: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:18 AM Lewis John Mcgibbney <  
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Folks,  
>>>>>>> I would like to propose that Usergrid moves towards a graduation.  
>>>>>>> I am satisfied that the UG podling community has proven itself  
>>>> suitable  
>>>>> of  
>>>>>>> graduation.  
>>>>>>> I would like to keep this thread open for a wee while for us to  
>>>> ponder  
>>>>>>> over  
>>>>>>> the graduation effort... based on the outcome we can make a  
>> decision  
>>>>> what  
>>>>>>> to do.  
>>>>>>> Excellent work on recent RC's Dave (I refrained on VOTE'ing to see  
>>>> if UG  
>>>>>>> was capable of making VOTE's and it was more than successful).  
>>>>>>> Thanks  
>>>>>>> Lewis  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --  
>>>>>>> *Lewis*  
>> 

Reply via email to