-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Will,
Will Glass-Husain wrote: > I'd be happy with the latter item. If this is set to a sufficiently high > number (20?) this prevents runaway macros yet will not limit typical use. Can I ask a stupid question: what is the problem we're trying to solve? Are we trying to avoid getting a stack overflow from runaway recursion? If so, what are we going to replace it with? I see we have two options: 1. Simply deny the macro call or 2. Throw another exception (MacroDepthExceededException?) The way I see it, neither of these options is any better than simply allowing the stack overflow to occur. Am I crazy? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGYGKj9CaO5/Lv0PARAq/rAKCjkbaIRIYas8AysrzDO+hQora+twCfSxix 7OuLJWdY58pbW8hLR6z8A6Y= =hWSQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
