2010/4/8 Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com>: >> I'd vote for a "src/sandbox" directory without any dedicated task, each >> tool in its own subdirectory with a small README file. Interested users >> can copy the source files towards the main source tree and issue "ant >> jar[.generic|.view|.struts]". The only thing to be done in the build >> file is to include src/sandbox in the released sources. But not in the >> released binary. >> >> If you use a different package name, early adopters will have to upgrade >> their parameters once the tools go into production. > > That is still more work in total for both me and any would be adopters > and will reduce their accesibility and thus may inhibit development of > them by anyone else. But whatever, these are not all that important > of tools, and my main desire is to just put them out there.
Sorry to jump in as an intruder, but if Maven was used, isolating non stable or experimental code is very easy. Long time ago I volunteered to make a Maven reorganization in a sandbox directory, if it was available. This offer, obviously, is still valid :-) Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
