>Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: >>>are we going to advertise equally two version for download at the same >>>time? >>>- until 2.0 can be considered 'ready enough' (release candidate stage? >>>beta stage?) we want to put it on the front page at all? >> >> >> I'm a llittle lost: what does "it" refer to? 2.0 beta will be probably >> in 2-3 weeks. We should be announcing it then. > >sorry, my wording is not allways the best, i was refering to the >download icon for 1.1.x and for 1.9.x > > Ah. As it gets closer, we should emphasize 2.0; and minimize the legacy. When we moved to 1.1 from 1.0, we went through something similar with no confusion (or not very much) and lots of the right downloads.
Cheers Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
