Hi,

I would like to enhance this proposal a little bit:

We are dealing with two different interpretations of a project:

a static project like API, Wordprocessor, Impress, Base, etc.

The IMHO more interesting interpretation of a project is the project management point of view: a project is a clearly described effort to achieve something in a certain timeframe.

Have a list of active project would point to the area where the current development effort are. That's why I introduced also the Category Projects to allow listing also of such Projects.

I'm unsure if we really need project in the sense of a static project:

My proposal for a new wiki home page <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page_tryout_mh>
may explain why

Information in general can be categorized into three types:

static documentation: such information get published at a time and is intended to be one way communication (such as plain documentation, FAQ, HowTo etc.).

dynamic documentation: this documents are usually worked on in project (project management pov) and often have the status draft. they may be published in the finish of a project and became then the status of static information (see above). This kind of communication of often bidirectional but asynchron.

communication often is a synchron style of communication and done within teams.

That why I like to propose some 1st level meta categories in the wiki, e.g.:
* Projects
* Documentation
* Teams

plus the introduction of a defined set of additional categories like API, Wordprocessor, Base, Porting , Minutes, Development, Build System, Tuturials, MacOSX, QA this allow us to implement additional structures within the wiki. Assigning all the pages to a category of that scheme would also reduce the amount of orphant pages (<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Special:Lonelypages>) currently we have more than 500 of such Lonely pages, that means that a significant amount of pages is not accessible by random users.

Right now I would not consider our wiki as an success, I'm impressed how many good pages have been created in the last few years, but I'm also disappointed about how difficult it is to get to new useful information.

But I'm convinced that if we agree on a common structure the wiki will get more successful than ever,

Martin

Matthias Mueller-Prove wrote:
Welcome to 8 new projects in the category "Project".

BTW - If your project does not have a wiki home, but a dedicated category already, you can edit your category page and add [[Category:Project]]. This is what I have done to the Website category.

cheers,
Matthias


At 13:32 14.09.2007, Matthias Mueller-Prove wrote:
Dear project leads,
if you are using the ooo wiki you might have a kind of home page over there.
I suggest to collect all project home pages under the category "Project".
Please add [[Category:Project]] to your wiki project home pages.
You are done if your page is listed here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Project

Thank You
Matthias :: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Mmp

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to