Hi Christian, >> - resolved the footer bug (by adding the nonfooter div), thanks Ivan for >> noting it that quickly. > > I don't like the idea of having unbalanced tags in the vm snippets and > to have to surround the contents with both a div and another time within > a table (the real contents) - but if that's the onlly way to do it...
I don't like it too much either... That's why I annotated it <!-- -->. Also I fear that it makes our website look more vulnerable to bad HTML practices... (especially if for some reason they decided to include divs into the design). >> - made logo clickable (refers to "/" ... which is better for projects... >> (i.e. if I'm at nl.openoffice.org I don't want to jump to >> www.openoffice.org ) > > Well - are you sure? That's why we got the crumbs, the project's > hierarchy-links. > (Projects > nl) - nl brings you to nl's mainpage. > > I feel it should point to www.openoffice.org I know that there are breadcrumbs... but a) only advanced users still know about breadcrumbs, b) for many native language projects their page is presented as 'The OpenOffice.org homepage'... offering download, support etc., everything the normal website does as well. It makes thus more sense from this perspective not to have such a prominent link linking to the 'English native language' website all the time. >> - moved homepage content to test > > another page with "regular" content should be added instead to have an > easy way to verify without a specially crafted page. I think another page should be page/s/ ... but just before I wanted to stop I received this e-mail from Louis, asking for status... it is nicer to present it as work on progress on the new website if it is presenting the new homepage as well ;) > And as you see, the left toolbars is centered vertically (or moved down > way too much) - while for the frontpage (www main-page) it is disabled > anyway, the regular pages should have it at the top, without the need to > scroll. (but as there are no other styles included than those for the > new design itself, that's not a big deal, one needs to add the styles > for IZ and the ML, CVS-Browser, etc anyway) True.. I want to say that I really like the, current, approach of just discarding the old CSS and introducing it only where needed, instead of the other way around where all CSS is included and we need to undo many of the preset CSS. Btw... what to do with all those pages with <p class="header"> ? ... maybe we can add a subtle background notifying the page maintainers that it /should/ be changed (thus still make them a little bit larger and stronger... but do include a red/yellow border aside/around of it...? g., Maarten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
