Hi T.J.,

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:53 PM, T. J. Frazier <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
>> I counted 3 zooms times before the 'y' in History started being
>> truncated (Both WinXP & Ubuntu, FF 3.0.5). After 5 zooms, all
>> characters started being truncated. That seems pretty reasonable - are
>> you using some special font?
>
> I run about 3 zooms above that. I admit that the cataract operation, and the
> progressive lenses I wear, may have something to do with that. 8-)>>>
> [glasses, smile, long grey beard here]. I view from about 30 inches away,
> very comfortably.

Wow! In that case, I would encourage you to use whole page zoom
instead of text-only zoom. I would expect most designs to break after
8 text zoom increases (but then again you probably have a much higher
resolution if you're watching it from 30 inches away).

>> The text moves downward because of the top padding which is required
>> to center the text in the tabs. I switched to a line-height solution
>> but it only produced a marginal improvement. Because the tab div has a
>> specific vertical height, it is not allowed to expand even if it wants
>> to - if it were, the text would remain vertically centered. There are
>> reasons why a specific height is set for the navigation, but if this
>> feature is needed, I could investigate further.
>>
>
> I admit to probably not understanding the problem; but then, I do CSS / HTML
> in Notepad, only very simple stuff.
> * Why is (vertical) centering in the tabs wanted or needed? Closer to the
> top should be OK.

For aesthetic reasons, mainly. Most navigations have their menu
entries vertically centered - it would look odd otherwise.

> For that matter, try running the zoom down four or five times (from /your/
> normal setting; more for mine). The text stays close to the top of the
> image.

Yes, but it doesn't reach the top of the navigation bar either. The
text always begins a fixed number of pixels below the very top of the
navigation, and this does not change whether you zoom in or out.

>>> On a page without an associated Discussion page, all the other tabs
>>> appear
>>> grey. The impression this gives is that the blue =  "you are on this
>>> tab",
>>> while the grey = "inactive, you are not here".  Quite a two-pipe problem.
>>> I
>>> would very much like to see some special color/shading designation for
>>> "action=edit" redlink.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by color/shading - as far as I know, every
>> .new (action = edit) link has a different style to its standard
>> counterpart.
>>
> AFAIK, CSS doesn't provide background patterns (although the images could,
> of course). At present, on the wiki Main Page, all the tabs except "Page"
> show grey.

They are blue on my display, and since we have the exact same browser,
they should be on yours too. Could you please send me a screenshot?

> The grey tabs all have some kind of "action=" link, but not
> always "=edit".
>
> This is a more serious problem than the zoom, because it affects everyone,
> not just near-sighted old fossils like me. I am seeking a way to make it
> visually *obvious* what's going on with the tabs. I suggest that the current
> styles don't do that. I seek to distinguish "you aren't here" from "you may
> not want to go here" (action=edit). Patterns could do that. Different colors
> could do that. Something else could do that?

You are here = blue outline + white background on the tab.
You can go here = blue link
You might not want to go here / Edit page = gray for navigation /
personal links, red for page content.

This is what was designed, and this is what I see. Perhaps the
distinction between the gray and blue links is not clear enough - do
you have a particular color in mind that you think would be better?
This is a valid point, but at this stage I need a better idea of what
you're seeing, because at the moment I'm too used to seeing what I
normally see (and I see the wiki pretty much every day) to imagine
anything different :)

Regards,
Ivan.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to