>>> any navigation ability (which >>> may be hidden too discretely under the logo) is not available. >>> >>> In short, OOSkin is very pretty, but less functional than I like, and >>> the >>> lack of functionality in other skins is disturbing. /tj/ >> >> Maybe something needs to be edited in the template code in order to >> get the books feature in Monobook so that people aren't 'locked into' >> using OOoskin just because it displays tools that others don't.
I can take a look at the old MonoBook skin and see what I can do to clean up the logos used there. The original OOo logos etc. used on the old MonoBook skin are far out of date, and need to be cleaned up. I have a feeling that since I've been focused on helping to get the OOoSkin tweaked, that I have neglected the MonoBook skin - eg I think I set the Wiki-wide default logo to the one used on OOoSkin, and that logo is too big for the MonoBook default. I will take a look into it this coming week. C. -- Clayton Cornell [email protected] OpenOffice.org Documentation Project co-lead StarOffice - Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Hamburg, Germany --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
