On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13/05/2010 Kay Schenk wrote: >> http://support.openoffice.org/tryout/ >> Please let me know if you have any immediate concerns...if not, I'll put >> this out for "real" early next week. > > It's nice! But I see the "version tagging" in place a bit confusing and > useless:
yes... :/ > - We waste an entire paragraph to describe conventions that will not be > used until the last section of the page > - I would go for a simpler color scheme: green for "All" and "3.x", red > for the (unsupported) 2.x and 1.x well...you'd still to explain this someplace I'm afraid...but I think this is worth pursuing because I do agree that the initial tags are annoying... > - Actually, I would second Lars' suggestion to create an archive page > and put all outdated stuff there, and only keep resources for the > current version in the main page, thus simplifying presentation. Anyway, > listing the unsupported versions in the support page looks very much > like an oxymoron! So just removing outdated resources would be OK too. > oh boy...I think for now I will just put what I have out there. It would be nice (maybe) to carry a separate page for the books for 1.x. I hesitate to do this because of the additional upkeep on a page like this (well there wouldn't be any upkeep but we'd still be tagging it along), AND because it really snuffs out those who have contributed in the past. OK, later and thanks for the comments. > Regards, > Andrea Pescetti - Italian N-L Project Lead. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." ~ Robert A. Heinlein --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
