On 06/19/2010 12:09 PM, Ivan M wrote: >> I see that there's a lot of work to do. Anyway, it isn't ideal to have >> different logo on the website and on the product. As a complete redesign >> that would implement a common HTML/CSS in all sites is a great idea, but >> until then we have the problem with the different logos. >> Could we therefore change the logo in the homepage and start on parallel the >> efforts for a sustainable redeisgn (including new technology and >> architecture)? >> I think that having a different logo on the main website and on the product >> is a bigger issue than having a different logo/design in the subpages. And >> as mentioned on my previous mail, your color proposal with the old design >> and the new logo is in my opinion perfect as a solution for the transition >> to a new design. I'd go for it. >> >> what do you think? > > I partially agree with Christoph's comments - when put side by side > with the current design, the adapted color scheme seems murky. > However, that could just be because they are side-by side? Updating > the main website and the wiki could be done in a short period of time > if there is agreement (so, others, please have your say!). I will make > a post about it on the branding list presenting the two alternatives > (Goran's and mine) and we can have something up by the end of this > week if all goes well.
There's nothing major holding back an update to the Wiki logo. It can be done anytime. C. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
